FREE LIVE SESSION WITH DR ANNA COHEN AND ISABEL FRASER

Free live session for clinicians

The Teenager Who Does
Not Want To Be Here

What to do when a young person was sent rather than referred, and gives you nothing.

There is probably one young person you thought of when you read that title.

The one who was sent. Or the one who is charming and entirely unreachable. The one who has made you quietly suspect that you are fine with children, fine with adults, and no good with teenagers.

You aren’t. In forty-five minutes we’ll show you what the refusal is actually for.

Free Wednesday 9 December, 7:00pm AEDT 45 minutes Live online Recording sent to everyone

 

FREE SESSION - Save your place

Wednesday 9 December 2026 · 7:00pm AEDT · 45 min

Free. The recording comes to you either way.

Can’t make the time? Register anyway and we’ll send you the recording.

Why we built this session

We don’t pathologise a two-year-old for saying no. We call it individuation and reassure the parents. We don’t pathologise a fifteen-year-old for arguing about a curfew. We call it separation and say it’s on track.

And then, the moment the same refusal is pointed at us, we quietly reclassify it. It stops being development and becomes a trait: unmotivated, oppositional, not ready.

Adolescence is the developmental business of deciding for yourself. We then put a young person in a room they didn’t choose, with an adult they didn’t pick, about a problem someone else named, and we’re surprised when they exercise the one decision available to them.

That isn’t a resistant teenager. It’s a young person doing exactly what their age asks of them, in the one place we’d rather they didn’t. Read properly, the refusal tells you where to start.

What we’ll work through

Four young people. One word.

We open with four young people who are all described with the same word in the referral notes. That word is wrong about every one of them, because each refusal is doing a different job.

Protecting autonomy

In a room they didn’t choose, saying no is the one decision still theirs to make.

Protecting identity

Being someone who needs a psychologist doesn’t fit who they’re working hard to become.

Managing genuine risk

Silence that keeps something unsafe from being said, or from going anywhere once it is.

Protecting belonging

Engaging with you would cost them something with the people they actually answer to.

All four file notes say the same thing.

“Unmotivated.”

Except “unmotivated” is not a formulation. It’s what we write when we don’t have one. Each of those four needs a different response, and telling them apart takes three moves, no confrontation and no new training.

The forty-five minutes

What you’ll leave with

Not a topic overview. A working method you can use in your next session.

1
Reading the refusal as informationWhat a guarded young person’s “no” is telling you, and why treating it as character closes the case before it opens.
2
The four things it protectsAutonomy, identity, safety and belonging, and how to tell them apart in the first three sessions without a confrontation.
3
The question that reorganises the sessionStop asking which strategy to use. Start asking where in the cycle of change this young person is stuck.
4
The sequencing errorMost stuck cases are stuck before the story or before the feeling, while most of the strategies we reach for live at the end. The right strategy at the wrong point doesn’t half-work.
5
A full worked case, start to finishOne young person, run end to end across nine sessions, with the reasoning shown at every step.
6
One thing to do on MondayBefore your next session with a young person who isn’t giving you anything, ask where they are in the cycle and what you’re about to ask of them too early.
Fit

Who this is for

This will suit you if…

  • You work with adolescents as a psychologist, counsellor, social worker, mental health OT or school psychologist.
  • You have a young person on your books right now who gives you nothing, and you’ve started to wonder whether that’s about you.
  • You see young people who were sent by a school, a parent or a court rather than coming of their own accord.
  • You’d rather understand a method than be handed a worksheet.
  • You’re at any stage, but it’s written for clinicians who are already competent and have one case that makes them doubt it.

It isn’t

  • An introduction to adolescent development for clinicians new to the population.
  • Risk assessment training. Risk and self-harm are discussed at the level of principle only.
  • A sales presentation with a lesson attached. The teaching is the whole forty-five minutes.
Who’s teaching

Two supervisors, thinking out loud

You’ll hear from both of us throughout and if we disagree in front of you, that’s not a mishap. It’s how we actually work.

Dr Anna Cohen

Dr Anna Cohen

Senior Clinical Psychologist

Area of Practice Endorsement in Clinical Psychology and board-approved clinical supervisor, with three decades of clinical practice with children and families, and author of five parenting books. Co-founder of Kids & Co Clinical Psychology, Heads & Tails Psychology and Counselling, and the Clinical Psychology Resource Centre.

Isabel Fraser

Isabel Fraser

Senior Clinical Psychologist

Board-approved clinical supervisor and co-founder of the Clinical Psychology Resource Centre, where she co-designs and co-presents the lectures, masterclasses and certification pathway. Much of her working week is spent supervising clinicians who work with children, adolescents and families - which means she sees, over and over, the cases that leave capable people stuck.

Method follows formulation. It’s the idea everything we teach is built on: you don’t pick a technique because you’re good at it, or because it worked for the last young person. You build a formulation of what’s maintaining this young person’s difficulty, and the formulation tells you which method to reach for.
Before you sign up

There’s no catch worth warning you about.

It’s free, and the teaching is the whole forty-five minutes. Nothing is held back for a paid version. We’ll mention what else we run at the end, once, and you’re welcome to ignore it.

Why we give it away

Information isn’t scarce any more. Everything we teach has been written down somewhere, and you could go and find most of it this evening if you had a spare six months. What’s scarce is having somebody experienced look at your case and tell you where the young person is stuck. So we give the information away because the information was never the valuable part.

Save your place

Wednesday 9 December 2026 · 7:00pm AEDT · 45 minutes

Free. Two minutes. The recording comes to you either way.

Save my place - it’s free

You’ll also start receiving The Monthly Vignette: one de-identified case a month, free, unsubscribe in one click.

Questions

Good to know